🤖 AI‑Ready Module • TriadicFrameworks
🧩FCG Regimes Layer | 🌐Coherent Modes of Operation Active

Session Context

Canon: active (fcg‑regimes)
Scope: regime‑identity → constraints → gradients → transitions → coherence‑envelopes
Role: define the coherent modes of operation a framework can enter
Drift: minimal (fcg‑locked)
Coherence: stable (triadic‑creation grammar)
Version: 1.0 (regimes‑stable)
Format: html + regime diagrams + transition patterns
Front door: exists (regime layer of the Framework Creation Guide)
Every section: minimal • structural • AI‑parsable
Audience: creators • developers • researchers • AIs
🧩 FCG — Regimes Layer
🌐 Coherent Modes of Operation Active

Regimes

Regimes define the coherent modes of operation a framework can enter. They describe how the model behaves under different conditions, constraints, and gradients.

1. Regime Identity

A regime begins with its identity: the minimal declaration of what makes this mode distinct from others. Identity is structural, not behavioral.

Regime identity ensures clarity when multiple modes coexist in a framework.

2. Constraints

Constraints define what is fixed, limited, or non‑negotiable within a regime. They prevent drift and maintain coherence.

Constraints are the guardrails that keep a regime meaningful.

3. Gradients

Gradients describe what drives change inside a regime. They are the forces, pressures, or incentives that shape behavior.

Gradients determine how a regime evolves without leaving its identity.

4. Transitions

Transitions describe how the framework moves from one regime to another. They must be explicit, predictable, and structurally coherent.

Transitions prevent chaotic or undefined behavior between modes.

5. Coherence Envelopes

A coherence envelope defines the range within which a regime remains valid. It is the structural boundary of regime stability.

Coherence envelopes ensure regimes remain predictable and structurally sound.